Crossing Lines: A Critical Look at the NBC Crime Drama’s ICC Portrayal

The NBC crime drama Crossing Lines intrigued audiences with its premise: an international police unit working for the International Criminal Court (ICC). Led by William Fichtner, the show featured high production values and a diverse European cast. The concept of international detectives collaborating on complex cases was inherently appealing.

However, the show’s portrayal of the ICC drew criticism for inaccuracies. The fictional ICC team investigates crimes like serial killings and drug smuggling—offenses outside the ICC’s actual jurisdiction, which focuses on war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and aggression.

The pilot episode attempts to address this jurisdictional gap with a weak explanation involving “topical crimes.” Later, a character argues that a serial killer case constitutes “a crime of aggression,” drastically stretching the legal definition.

The show also introduces a subplot where the ICC initially resists the team’s formation due to sovereignty concerns. This valid real-world concern is quickly overcome by a contrived appeal to emotion and a vague order. This highlights the show’s loose grasp of the ICC’s legal framework.

Inaccuracies extend beyond the premise. An incorrect ICC logo, a misplaced setting (Holland instead of the Netherlands), advanced equipment beyond the ICC’s budget, and an English-only parking sign at the supposedly international court all undermine the show’s credibility.

While dramatic license is expected, Crossing Lines takes liberties that potentially damage the ICC’s image. The show could reinforce misconceptions about the Court’s role and jurisdiction, particularly in the skeptical United States.

Interpol, which facilitates international police cooperation, would have been a more plausible setting. Its focus on transnational crime aligns better with the show’s investigations, eliminating the need for convoluted justifications.

Despite initial interest, Crossing Lines was canceled after three seasons. Its misrepresentation of the ICC remains a point of contention for those concerned about accuracy in portraying international institutions in media.