Reality Television Shows: A Deep Dive into the World of Police Procedurals

The summer months in Australia often see a shift in television programming, with expensive dramas making way for cheaper alternatives. This period, known as the non-ratings period, has recently been dominated by locally made police Reality Television Shows. These shows, often filmed in a fly-on-the-wall documentary style, follow a formulaic structure, weaving multiple stories into hour-long episodes. The popularity of these shows raises questions about their appeal and their impact on viewers’ perceptions of law enforcement.

The fascination with police reality TV is a complex phenomenon. For many from working-class backgrounds, the relationship with the police is ambivalent. Family ties to law enforcement are common, yet so are experiences of harassment, discrimination, and even brutality, particularly for people of color. This duality creates a tension between respect for authority and a healthy skepticism towards its potential for abuse.

This inherent contradiction is further complicated by political perspectives. While some left-leaning activists readily condemn the police as instruments of state violence, others recognize the individual officers, often from working-class backgrounds themselves, as sharing similar concerns with the communities they serve. Acknowledging the presence of racism, sexism, and homophobia within police ranks while also recognizing the existence of dedicated officers committed to community service highlights the nuanced nature of the issue.

The appeal of police reality TV lies in its portrayal of everyday working life. In contrast to the polished and often unrealistic depictions of police work in fictional dramas, these shows offer a glimpse into the mundane aspects of policing. The paperwork, the waiting, the seemingly endless repetition of tasks – these are the realities rarely shown elsewhere.

Beyond the procedural elements, these shows also delve into social issues. Alcohol abuse, domestic violence, and mental health crises are recurring themes, offering viewers insight into the challenges faced by both the police and the communities they serve. By showcasing the consequences of illegal and anti-social behavior, the shows arguably serve as a deterrent and a reminder of the ever-present eyes of the law.

The entertainment value of these shows is undeniable. The ride-along format provides a vicarious thrill, allowing viewers to experience the adrenaline rush of chases and arrests from the safety of their homes. Observing the interactions between police and the public, whether suspects or those seeking assistance, offers a voyeuristic glimpse into the human drama of everyday life.

However, the overwhelmingly positive portrayal of law enforcement in these reality shows raises concerns about their function as public relations tools. With the cooperation of police units and the endorsement of police chiefs, these programs often present a sanitized version of reality, devoid of the controversies that plague real-world policing. The absence of police brutality, racism, sexism, and corruption creates a disconnect between the televised image and the documented realities of law enforcement.

While these shows offer valuable insights into the daily routines and challenges of police work, their selective presentation of reality necessitates a critical viewing approach. The omission of negative aspects of policing raises questions about the shows’ ultimate message and their potential to shape public perception. Enjoying the depiction of working-class jobs is one thing, but acknowledging the complexities and contradictions inherent in the relationship between the police and the communities they serve is crucial for a balanced understanding.