Tracker Television Show: A Derivative Disappointment
I desperately wanted to enjoy the Tracker Television Show. Truly. The pilot episode was borderline acceptable, leaving room for optimism. However, the second episode solidified my initial impression: Tracker is disappointingly derivative. Everything feels recycled from previous, superior shows. The formulaic plot features a protagonist haunted by a troubled past, partnered with a tech-savvy sidekick who handles the behind-the-scenes work. Supporting characters function as mere office managers, lacking depth and intrigue. Storylines have been superficial, action sequences forced and illogical.
The show also suffers from amateurish editing. In the second episode, around the 11-minute mark, a glaring continuity error occurs. A scene depicting a downpour, with the protagonist’s truck visibly wet and covered in raindrops, is immediately followed by a shot of the same truck completely dry and spotless, passenger window down. This jarring inconsistency demonstrates a lack of attention to detail that undermines the show’s credibility. Such obvious gaffes detract from the viewing experience and highlight the production’s shortcomings.
The Tracker television show exemplifies the current trend of unoriginal remakes, reboots, and sequels plaguing the entertainment industry. This reliance on familiar formulas signals a dearth of creativity and writing talent. While Tracker might survive its first season, as history demonstrates that quality doesn’t guarantee success, it’s unlikely to leave a lasting impact. Hopefully, the network will recognize its failings and end its run sooner rather than later. While not the absolute worst show currently airing, Tracker offers nothing new or compelling, making it an easy pass for discerning viewers.
